Asia
Chinese hotel guests unwittingly broadcast having sex to large audience
A pair of individuals who had been staying in Shenzhen found that their private moments had been secretly recorded and used to create explicit content.
In 2023, Eric stumbled upon a disturbing discovery while browsing a social media platform for adult content. A video caught his attention, and within seconds, he was shocked to recognize the individuals on screen.

The footage depicted a couple arriving at a hotel, unpacking, and engaging in intimate activities – a couple that Eric realized was himself and his girlfriend. This revelation was particularly disturbing, as they had stayed at a hotel in Shenzhen, southern China, just three weeks prior, completely unaware of being surveilled.
It became clear that a hidden camera in their hotel room had recorded their private moments, which were then shared with a large online audience, including those who used the same social media channel that Eric had accessed.
Eric, whose name has been changed for anonymity, found himself in the unfortunate position of being both a consumer and a victim of China's clandestine spy-cam porn industry.
Note: The following story may contain language that some readers find objectionable.
The phenomenon of spy-cam porn has been present in China for over a decade, despite the country's strict laws prohibiting the production and distribution of pornographic content.
In recent years, the issue has gained significant attention on social media platforms, with many individuals, especially women, sharing advice on detecting hidden cameras that can be as small as a pencil eraser. Some have taken extreme measures, such as setting up tents in their hotel rooms, to avoid being secretly recorded.
In an effort to address the problem, the government introduced new regulations in April of last year, mandating that hotel owners conduct regular checks for hidden cameras in their establishments.
However, the problem persists, with the BBC World Service uncovering thousands of recent spy-cam videos recorded in hotel rooms and sold as pornographic material on various websites.
Many of these videos are promoted through the messaging and social media app Telegram, where over the course of 18 months, six different websites and apps were found to be advertising their services. Collectively, these platforms claimed to operate over 180 spy-cams in hotel rooms, which were not only recording but also livestreaming the activities of hotel guests.
Over the course of seven months, an observation of one such website revealed footage from 54 distinct cameras, with roughly half of them actively capturing content at any given time.
According to BBC estimates, based on average occupancy rates, it is possible that thousands of individuals were unknowingly filmed during this period, with the majority likely remaining unaware that they were captured on camera.
A man from Hong Kong, identified as Eric, started watching covertly filmed videos in his teenage years, drawn to their unedited nature.
Eric, now in his 30s, explains that the allure of these videos stemmed from the fact that the subjects were unaware of being filmed, stating, "I think traditional adult content can feel very scripted and artificial."
However, Eric's perspective shifted when he discovered a video featuring himself and his girlfriend, "Emily", which led to a loss of interest in this type of content, as he experienced firsthand the other side of the equation.
Emily's initial reaction was skepticism when she was informed that their hotel stay had been secretly recorded, compiled into a one-hour video, and shared on Telegram. However, upon viewing the footage herself, her disbelief turned to embarrassment.
The potential consequences of the video being seen by Emily's colleagues and relatives left her deeply distressed. As a result, the couple ceased communication with each other for several weeks.
The inner workings of the industry, which profits from the unauthorized recording and distribution of intimate moments, raise important questions about its operations and key players.
During the investigation, a notable figure emerged: an individual known by the alias "AKA", who appeared to be a significant player in the spy-cam porn trade.
By posing as a customer, it was possible to gain access to a livestreaming platform promoted by this individual, with a monthly subscription fee of 450 Yuan, equivalent to $65 or £47.
After accessing the system, multiple live feeds from various hotel rooms became available, activated when guests inserted their key cards and turned on the power. Additionally, users could rewind and replay footage from the beginning of the stream, as well as download recorded clips from the archive.
Despite being prohibited in China, Telegram remains a platform of choice for illicit activities, including the promotion of these livestreams by AKA. During the investigation, one Telegram channel associated with AKA had a membership of up to 10,000 users.

AKA also offers compilations of edited livestream clips for purchase on Telegram at a fixed price. The available archive contained over 6,000 videos, with the earliest dating back to 2017.
Subscribers to AKA's Telegram channel engage in real-time discussions while watching the footage of unsuspecting hotel guests, making comments about their physical appearance, speculating about their conversations, and evaluating their intimate activities.
The subscribers often react with excitement when a couple engages in sexual activity, and express disappointment if the lights are turned off, obscuring their view. Female guests are frequently subjected to derogatory language, including terms such as "sluts", "whores", and "bitches".
An investigation led to the discovery of a spy-cam in a hotel room in Zhengzhou, central China, by compiling information from various sources, including subscribers, social media posts, and in-house research.
Upon gaining access to the room, on-site researchers discovered a hidden camera, positioned to capture footage of the bed, concealed within the wall's ventilation system and connected to the hotel's electrical supply.
Utilizing a device designed to detect hidden cameras, a popular tool among travelers, failed to alert individuals that they were being surveilled.
After the camera was disabled, news of the discovery spread rapidly through a Telegram channel.
A message on the primary channel, managed by AKA, announced, "Zhonghua [camera name] has been taken down," prompting a response from a subscriber.
AKA expressed regret in the chat, noting that the room in question had exceptional audio quality.
However, the mood shifted from disappointment to excitement when AKA announced that a new camera had been set up in an alternative location, all within a matter of hours.
AKA highlighted the efficiency of their livestreaming platform, remarking to subscribers, "This is the speed of… [our livestreaming platform]," and invited them to consider its impressiveness.
Our 18-month investigation uncovered around a dozen individuals operating in a similar capacity to AKA.
Through their interactions with subscribers, these agents revealed that they were acting on behalf of more senior figures, referred to as "camera owners," who were responsible for organizing the installation of hidden cameras and overseeing the livestreaming platforms.
In a private conversation, AKA inadvertently shared a screenshot of a message from an individual identified as "Brother Chun", who was referred to as a "camera owner".
After AKA deleted the message and declined to comment further, an investigation led to direct contact with Brother Chun. Despite evidence suggesting his involvement in providing equipment to AKA, Brother Chun described himself as merely a sales agent, while hinting at a more extensive supply chain.
The financial gains from these activities are substantial. According to BBC estimates, AKA has earned a minimum of 163,200 Yuan ($22,000, £16,300) since April of last year, based on channel membership and subscription fees. For context, China's Bureau of Statistics reported an average annual income of 43,377 Yuan ($6,200, £4,600) in the country last year.
Although China has strict regulations governing the sale and use of spy cameras, a visit to the country's largest electronics market in Huaqiangbei revealed that purchasing such a device is relatively straightforward.

Obtaining precise data on the number of individuals prosecuted for spy-cam related offenses is challenging. While Chinese authorities have been less forthcoming with legal case details in recent years, available records indicate that cases have been reported across various regions, including Jilin province in the north and Guangdong in the south.
According to Blue Li of RainLily, a Hong Kong-based NGO that assists victims in removing secretly filmed explicit content from the internet, the organization is experiencing an increase in demand for its services. However, the process of removing such content is becoming increasingly challenging.
Li notes that Telegram does not respond to RainLily's removal requests, which necessitates direct contact with group administrators who are often involved in selling or distributing the explicit material. This approach is often ineffective, as these administrators have limited motivation to cooperate.
Li emphasizes that tech companies bear significant responsibility in addressing the issue of non-consensual content sharing. She argues that these companies are not passive platforms, as their policies play a crucial role in shaping the dissemination of content.
Despite the BBC reporting AKA and Brother Chun's groups to Telegram for sharing spy-cam pornography via its reporting function, the platform took no action. The BBC had informed Telegram about the groups' activities, but there was no response.
When contacted by the BBC again, 10 days later, with a full investigation report, Telegram stated that sharing non-consensual pornography is strictly prohibited by its terms of service. The company claimed to proactively moderate and remove millions of pieces of harmful content daily, and it accepts reports of inappropriate content to facilitate removal.
An official report was presented to Brother Chun and AKA, outlining how they were generating profits by taking advantage of unsuspecting hotel guests. Despite not receiving a response, it was observed that the Telegram accounts used to promote the content were deleted within hours. Nevertheless, the website that AKA had sold access to continues to broadcast live footage of hotel guests.
Eric and Emily are still dealing with the aftermath of their ordeal, which has left them traumatized. As a precautionary measure, they wear hats when out in public to avoid being identified, and they also try to limit their stays in hotels. Eric claims to have stopped using Telegram channels to view explicit content, but he periodically checks them, fearing that the footage of him could resurface.
Additional reporting for this story was provided by Cate Brown, Bridget Wing, and Mengyu Dong.
Asia
Emergency call recording reveals boy’s heroic swim to save family
A 13-year-old boy, Austin Appelbee, took action to secure assistance for his mother and siblings when they were pulled out into the ocean.
An audio recording has been made public by authorities, capturing a distress call made by a 13-year-old Australian boy who swam for an extended period to seek assistance for his family after they were caught in a strong current at sea in early February.
During the call, the boy, identified as Austin Appelbee, informs emergency services that his brother, Beau, 12, sister, Grace, eight, and their mother remain in the water, awaiting rescue.
Austin expresses concern for his family's well-being, stating that he is unsure of their current condition, which is causing him significant distress.
The teenager also reports feeling severely exhausted, a result of his prolonged and physically demanding effort to reach shore and call for help.
Following the call, Austin lost consciousness and was hospitalized, where he later received news that his mother, brother, and sister had been rescued approximately 14 kilometers offshore and were in good health.
Asia
Australian opposition leader faces pressure after key staff member quits
The departure of a high-ranking colleague has created an opportunity for a potential challenge to Sussan Ley, who holds the distinction of being the first female leader of the Liberal party.
Sussan Ley, the first female leader of the Liberal Party, is facing renewed scrutiny following the departure of Angus Taylor, her shadow defence minister, from the party's leadership team.

Taylor's resignation is expected to pave the way for a potential challenge to Ley's leadership, with local media outlets suggesting he has been quietly working to unseat her for some time.
Ley's tenure has been marked by struggles, including a narrow victory over Taylor in a leadership contest last year, which was held in the aftermath of the party's worst-ever electoral performance.
The Liberal-National coalition, a partnership that dates back to the 1940s, has experienced significant instability under Ley's leadership, having split and reunited twice during her tenure.
On Wednesday, Taylor, a member of the party's conservative faction, announced his resignation from the leadership team, citing his commitment to continuing to serve the Liberal Party.
In a statement to reporters, Taylor expressed his disappointment with the party's inability to hold the current Labor government accountable, emphasizing the need to protect Australians' way of life and restore their standard of living.
Taylor stated that he does not believe Ley is capable of leading the party effectively, citing the need for a change in leadership.
It remains to be seen whether Taylor's allies within the shadow cabinet will follow his lead and resign from their positions.
Local media reports suggest that Taylor's supporters are planning to request a special party meeting to consider a spill motion, which would allow the party to reconsider its leadership.
If Taylor were to succeed in his bid for leadership, it would bring an end to the ongoing speculation surrounding Ley's tenure, which has been marred by uncertainty.
The coalition's most recent split, which occurred in January, was followed by a reunification just days ago, after a dispute over hate speech laws, which Ley had supported in the wake of the Bondi Beach attack in December.
At the time of the initial split, Nationals leader David Littleproud explicitly stated that his party could not continue to serve in a shadow cabinet under Ley's leadership.
Recent polling data has shown the One Nation party, which secured 6% of the national vote in the previous election, surpassing the Coalition to take second place behind Labor, while Ley's personal approval ratings remain low.
The coalition has yet to reach a consensus on the factors that contributed to its decisive election loss to Labor, which saw the Liberals suffer significant losses in major cities.
In the aftermath of the election, the coalition briefly split over disagreements on climate and energy policy, including its commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, a policy that the Liberals later abandoned under pressure from the Nationals and their own right-wing faction.
The Nationals, which have a strong presence in rural areas and tend to lean more conservative than the Liberals, have been pushed further to the right in response to the surge in support for the One Nation party, according to political analysts, who note that this shift may hinder the Liberals' ability to appeal to centrist voters in urban areas.
Asia
India sets 3-hour deadline for social media firms to remove illegal content
Concerns have been raised that the regulations may pose a difficulty for tech companies in terms of compliance and potentially lead to increased censorship.
In a significant update to its existing regulations, India has implemented new rules requiring social media companies to delete unlawful content within a three-hour window after being notified, a substantial reduction from the previous 36-hour timeframe.

These revised guidelines, set to come into effect on February 20, will apply to prominent platforms such as Meta, YouTube, and X, as well as content generated using artificial intelligence.
The government has not provided a specific reason for shortening the deadline for removing objectionable content.
Critics, however, are concerned that this move may be part of a broader effort to increase oversight of online content, potentially leading to censorship in a country with over a billion internet users, which is the world's largest democracy.
In the past, Indian authorities have utilized existing Information Technology rules to direct social media platforms to remove content deemed illegal under laws related to national security and public order, granting them broad authority over online content.
According to transparency reports, Indian authorities requested the removal of more than 28,000 URLs or web links in 2024, which were subsequently blocked.
The BBC has sought comment from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology regarding the latest amendments, while Meta has declined to comment; the BBC has also reached out to X and Google, the owner of YouTube, for their response.
The updated regulations also introduce new guidelines for AI-generated content, marking a significant development in the country's approach to regulating online material.
For the first time, Indian law defines AI-generated content, including audio and video that has been created or altered to appear realistic, such as deepfakes, while excluding ordinary editing, accessibility features, and genuine educational or design work.
Platforms that allow users to create or share AI-generated content must clearly label it, and where possible, add permanent markers to facilitate tracing its origin.
Once labels are added to AI-generated content, companies will not be permitted to remove them; furthermore, they must utilize automated tools to detect and prevent the dissemination of illegal AI content, including deceptive or non-consensual material.
Technology experts and digital rights groups have expressed concerns regarding the feasibility and implications of the new regulations.
The Internet Freedom Foundation has stated that the shortened timeline will effectively transform platforms into "rapid fire censors," highlighting the potential risks associated with the updated rules.
The group has argued that the extremely short deadlines will eliminate the possibility of meaningful human review, forcing platforms to rely on automated removals, which may lead to over-removal of content.
Anushka Jain, a research associate at the Digital Futures Lab, has welcomed the requirement for labeling AI-generated content, suggesting that it could enhance transparency; however, she has also cautioned that the three-hour deadline may push companies towards complete automation.
Jain has noted that companies are already struggling to comply with the 36-hour deadline due to the need for human oversight, and that a fully automated process may result in the censorship of legitimate content.
Prasanto K Roy, a Delhi-based technology analyst, has described the new regulations as "perhaps the most extreme takedown regime in any democracy," highlighting the challenges associated with compliance.
Roy has stated that meeting the new requirements will be "nearly impossible" without extensive automation and minimal human oversight, as the tight deadline leaves little room for assessing the legitimacy of removal requests.
Regarding the labeling of AI-generated content, Roy has acknowledged the positive intention behind the regulation but has also noted that reliable and tamper-proof labeling technologies are still in development.
The BBC has requested a response from the Indian government regarding the concerns raised by technology experts and digital rights groups.
-
News10 hours agoAustralian Politics Faces Questions Over Gender Equality Amid Sussan Ley’s Appointment
-
News7 hours agoFarage Says Reform to Replace Traditional Tory Party
-
News7 hours agoWrexham Pair Seek Win Against Former Team Ipswich
-
News12 hours agoLiberal Party Removes Australia’s First Female Leader
-
News10 hours agoUK Braces for Cold Snap with Snow and Ice Alerts Expected
-
News7 hours agoHusband’s alleged £600k theft for sex and antiques blamed on drug side effects
-
News2 days agoSunbed ads spreading harmful misinformation to young people
-
Business13 hours agoBBC Reporter Exposed to Cyber Attack Due to Vulnerabilities in AI Coding Tool
