UK
Friends lose £8k in rental scam, left distraught
According to the Chartered Trading Standards Institute, consumers are being advised to exercise caution and “take a step back”.
A pair of friends claim they were left distraught after paying £8,000 for a rental property in north London, only to discover it was actually a short-term holiday let.

Following an in-person viewing, Sarah and Amy, whose names have been changed, signed a rental agreement for a flat in Islington's Chapel Market, but upon arrival on their scheduled move-in day, they found that the property was not what they had expected.
According to the BBC, approximately 20 individuals have fallen victim to a scam involving the same property, with Sarah and Amy being among those affected.
Sarah, a 29-year-old from the Surrey and Hampshire area, recounted her experience, stating: "When I arrived at the property with my mother and all my belongings, I knocked on the door, but no one answered."
Sarah expressed her surprise and confusion, saying: "I was unaware that such scams existed, and I didn't comprehend how something like this could occur."
According to Amy, the prospect of cohabiting was a thrilling one, as they had both taken the significant step of packing up their belongings to make the move, with the safety net of being able to return to their family homes if needed.
By March 2025, Sarah and Amy had been contemplating a move to London together for some time, and it was during this period that they stumbled upon a property listing that caught their attention due to its competitive pricing.
The duo's inquiry led them to a letting agent, who arranged an in-person viewing; although Amy participated remotely via video call, Sarah attended the viewing in person.
In an effort to guarantee the property, the pair subsequently proposed paying a substantial upfront sum, comprising a six-week deposit and three months' rent, which totalled approximately £8,000.
Upon arriving to collect the keys, Sarah recounted that she was kept waiting for nearly an hour, only to be informed by a cleaner who answered the door that the flat was actually being used as a short-term holiday rental.

The two individuals are in contact with others who also claim to have been victims of the scam, having paid money for the same property, and are warning others to be cautious of this allegedly complex deception.
According to Sarah and Amy, the people they met in person and spoke with over the phone seemed credible, and the process they underwent was nearly indistinguishable from a standard tenancy application process.
The pair discovered that the scammers had stolen the identities of both the property's landlord and a letting agency, using these stolen identities to carry out their scheme.
Alison Farrar, lead officer for property and lettings at the Chartered Trading Standards Institute, noted that a scammer could potentially rent a property for a short period, schedule multiple appointments, and meet with numerous people in a single day.
Farrar explained that scammers often follow the usual protocols, making it challenging for individuals to determine whether they are being deceived or not.
Prospective tenants are advised to exercise caution when dealing with landlords or agents who apply pressure. It is reasonable to inquire about the reasons behind such tactics, as legitimate individuals will not rush the process.
A forthcoming requirement will mandate landlord registration in a database, enabling renters to verify the ownership of properties and ensure that the listed owner matches the one they have been informed of.
According to Helen Maguire, MP for Epsom and Ewell, a significant vulnerability exists in the tenancy deposit system, where official-appearing certificates can provide renters with a false sense of security.
Maguire intends to continue advocating for the government to enhance protections, addressing the issue that allows individuals to suffer substantial financial losses due to a system they believed was trustworthy.
Following their report to Action Fraud, now known as Report Fraud, Sarah and Amy were able to recover most of their lost funds, with the exception of a minor administrative fee.
Report Fraud has confirmed that it received the complaint and subsequently referred the matter to the Metropolitan Police for further investigation.
According to the police, they have logged several instances of suspected rental fraud that occurred from January to July 2025.
News
Life sentences imposed on two individuals for conspiring to target Jewish community
Two individuals have been imprisoned for their involvement in a plot that authorities believe had the potential to become the most lethal terrorist attack in the UK.
A life sentence has been imposed on two individuals who conspired to launch a devastating attack on Manchester's Jewish community, an incident that could have resulted in the UK's most lethal terrorist assault to date.

According to evidence presented at Preston Crown Court, Walid Saadaoui, 38, and Amar Hussein, 52, orchestrated the smuggling of firearms into the UK as part of a plot inspired by Isis.
The plans were thwarted thanks to the efforts of an undercover operative, whose involvement was deemed pivotal by Greater Manchester Police in preventing the attack.
The court sentenced Walid Saadaoui and Amar Hussein to minimum prison terms of 37 and 26 years, respectively, for their roles in the conspiracy.
Walid Saadaoui, a resident of Abram in Wigan, and Amar Hussein, who has no fixed address, were convicted of preparing acts of terrorism during a period spanning from 13 December 2023 to 9 May 2024.
Bilel Saadaoui, Walid's 36-year-old brother, has also been found guilty of failing to report information about terrorist activities.
This developing story will be updated with additional information as it becomes available; please check back for the most comprehensive version.
News
Pair imprisoned following letterbox shooting linked to drug debt feud
The child was transported to a hospital, where it was determined that his injuries were not critical.
A pair of men from Bristol have received prison sentences totalling over 14 years for their roles in a shooting incident in Cardiff, where a teenager was injured after being shot through a letterbox with a double-barrelled shotgun.

On June 7, at 19:36, Efekan Karahan, 18, approached a house in Cardiff's Pontprennau area and fired his shotgun twice, striking the 15-year-old victim in the legs; Karahan was subsequently sentenced to 8 years and 4 months in prison.
Karahan's accomplice, Ashley Fernando Corbin, 21, also from Bristol, waited nearby during the shooting and received a 6-year prison sentence for his involvement.
According to evidence presented at Newport Crown Court, the attack was linked to an ongoing feud involving the drugs trade, which included a family member of the teenage victim who suffered non-life-threatening injuries.
Prosecutor Clare Wilkins outlined the events of the incident, stating that the 15-year-old victim was at home caring for his brother when he went downstairs to make a cup of tea, unaware of the danger that awaited him.
As the victim entered the kitchen, he was startled by a loud noise at the front door, which would soon be followed by a more severe and life-threatening event.
Wilkins described how the victim then proceeded to the hallway, where he saw a figure through the glass panel in the front door, immediately followed by the sound of a gunshot and the letterbox being dislodged; a second shot was then fired, striking the victim, who managed to move out of sight.
After being shot, the teenager returned upstairs to check on his brother and soon realised he was bleeding from his leg, prompting him to seek help.
From the bedroom window, the victim spotted Corbin filming Karahan on his phone, with both men wearing balaclavas, a scene that would later be recounted in court.
The court was shown footage from a mobile phone and CCTV, which captured Karahan slipping on the tiled entrance to the house and forcefully hitting the door, an event that the victim had initially mistaken for someone kicking the door.
After firing the shotgun through the letterbox, Karahan was seen tripping over a railing while fleeing the scene, further evidence of the chaotic nature of the incident.
Karahan lost control of the shotgun momentarily before regaining possession of it and making his way across a field to a waiting vehicle, which had been fitted with cloned number plates.
The prosecution argued that the two defendants had travelled from Bristol to Cardiff with the intention of carrying out the attack, which was part of a larger, ongoing feud involving the drugs trade and a family member of the victim.
In the aftermath of the shooting, the victim contacted his older brother, who arrived at the house shortly afterwards and attempted to follow the defendants' vehicle.
The older brother returned home and called an ambulance for his younger brother, who was described in court as being pale and scared following the traumatic event.
A subsequent medical examination revealed that the teenager had suffered injuries from 30 pellets in his left leg, which had ricocheted and caused the harm.
In his defence, Ieuan Callaghan argued that Karahan had been exploited by criminal gangs in Bristol, portraying him as neither a dangerous nor sophisticated criminal.
Meanwhile, Ruth Smith, defending Corbin, suggested that her client had been vulnerable to exploitation by drug gangs since being excluded from school at the age of 13.
Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, in sentencing Karahan, emphasized that he had played a significant role in the incident, stating, "You pulled the trigger, not once but twice, which is not a lesser role," while also describing Corbin as having a pro-criminal attitude and being dangerous.
Leighton Mawer of the Crown Prosecution Service noted that the two defendants had carefully planned their actions, including the use of a firearm, which resulted in serious injuries to the victim.
Mawer added that the discharge of firearms can often have fatal consequences, but fortunately, this incident did not result in the loss of life.
News
Service Member Injured in Stabbing Incident Close to Military Base
According to Lt Col Mark Teeton, he considers himself lucky following what he describes as a premeditated and intentional assault perpetrated by Anthony Esan.
Lt Col Mark Teeton recalled the moment his life was put in danger when Anthony Esan dropped his deceptive facade and unleashed a violent attack, saying, "I knew I was in trouble."

On 23 July 2024, at approximately 18:00 BST, Teeton's routine walk home from Brompton Barracks was disrupted when Esan approached him, requesting to borrow his mobile phone to seek help for his broken-down moped.
Within three minutes, Teeton had suffered a brutal stabbing, which was briefly interrupted when his wife intervened, pushing Esan away as he lunged at her husband.
In an interview with the BBC, Teeton reflected on his ordeal, stating, "I was fortunate to have survived."
Esan, aged 25, received a life sentence with a minimum term of seven years and 162 days at Maidstone Crown Court.
During the sentencing, Mr Justice Picken described the attack as having an "unimaginable horror."
The judge also ruled that Esan would be detained in a hospital for as long as necessary.
Prior to the attack, Esan had conducted online searches for knives, a terrorist attack in West Africa, and TikTok videos depicting knife attacks in other countries.

The court heard that Esan had also searched for information on the 2013 murder of Lee Rigby, referred to as the "Woolwich soldier murdered."
Forensic psychiatrists testified that Esan's actions were more likely driven by psychosis, but that he had intentionally targeted a soldier.
Mr Justice Picken stated, "The attack on Mr Teeton was targeted and deliberate."
Addressing Esan, the judge said, "You intentionally sought out a soldier with the intention of causing fatal harm, as evident from your online search of the Lee Rigby killing."
Eileen Teeton, Mark's wife, recounted how she rushed from their home and confronted the assailant, but Esan's gaze followed her.
She described how Esan then turned his attention back to her husband, at which point she realized the victim was her husband.
After Esan ceased his attack and fled on his moped, Eileen's priority was to get her husband medical attention as quickly as possible.
As Teeton drifted in and out of consciousness, guards from the nearby barracks, local residents, police, and paramedics arrived at the scene.
Teeton was rushed to Kings College Hospital in London, where he underwent emergency surgery, while his wife followed, unsure if he would survive.
Following the sentencing, Teeton stated that Esan's life imprisonment reflected the premeditation and planning that went into the attack against him, a British military officer.
He added, "Knife attacks have far-reaching consequences, affecting not only the victim but also their families and the communities where they occur."
Teeton expressed his empathy, saying, "We feel the pain of every knife attack we see in the news, and our thoughts are always with those affected."
Prior to the attack, Teeton, a 26-year veteran of the military, had completed four tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He credited the swift response of paramedics, who arrived by air ambulance, with helping to save his life.
Teeton also acknowledged the role of locals who provided first aid, saying, "The immediate care they provided, along with the basic first aid principles they applied, absolutely saved me."
After a three-week hospital stay, Teeton returned home to find that the military had relocated his family to a more private area.
He then spent five weeks at a rehabilitation centre for injured military personnel near Loughborough before returning to work full-time in January 2025.
In January, Esan pleaded guilty to attempted murder, following several delays in the case due to concerns about his mental health.
Esan had previously attempted to join the British Army on multiple occasions, with his first application submitted in 2020.
In the same year, he was referred to mental health services due to apparent mental health issues and reports of hearing voices.
Esan's mother believed that, given his mental state, he should not have been in the community, according to testimony presented in court.
Eileen Teeton, who sings in a military wives choir, expressed relief that Esan had pleaded guilty, sparing them the ordeal of a trial.
She stated, "We felt a massive sense of relief that he had taken responsibility for his actions and pleaded guilty, sparing us and the jurors from reliving the horrific ordeal."
-
News14 hours agoAustralian Politics Faces Questions Over Gender Equality Amid Sussan Ley’s Appointment
-
News11 hours agoFarage Says Reform to Replace Traditional Tory Party
-
News11 hours agoWrexham Pair Seek Win Against Former Team Ipswich
-
News16 hours agoLiberal Party Removes Australia’s First Female Leader
-
News14 hours agoUK Braces for Cold Snap with Snow and Ice Alerts Expected
-
News11 hours agoHusband’s alleged £600k theft for sex and antiques blamed on drug side effects
-
News2 days agoSunbed ads spreading harmful misinformation to young people
-
Business16 hours agoBBC Reporter Exposed to Cyber Attack Due to Vulnerabilities in AI Coding Tool
